Tag Archives: moral

wasting food

Even though I try really hard to buy only the gro­ceries we need and in amounts we can use, my hus­band & I still end up throw­ing away a pretty good bit of food on a reg­u­lar basis. What I can’t fig­ure out is why throw­ing away food feels so much worse than let­ting clothes

more thoughts on veganism and well-being

I was thrilled to receive this thought­ful com­ment on my last post on my vegan exper­i­ment: Com­ment from abeala I have some dis­jointed things to say in response. First of all, yes, it can def­i­nitely be dif­fi­cult to have a sig­nif­i­cant other who does not eat the same way as you. Around the time I

madeleine albright thinks I'm going to hell

The other day, I saw a Madeleine Albright quote in my Twit­ter time­line. I don’t know if this Time mag­a­zine inter­view is the orig­i­nal source, but this is the quote (bold): What advice do you have for women who want respect from their male col­leagues? Dana Philbin, CHICAGO Women have to be active lis­ten­ers and

kant on queueing, or why I am not a kantian

In response to my post on how not to think about cut­ting in line, Jacob Levy makes these impor­tant points: I’m puz­zled. This seems like the eas­i­est of cases for a Kant­ian. I can­not will as a uni­ver­sal maxim that the cut­ter be allowed into line, because that would destroy the coher­ence of lin­ing up.

my least favorite facebook group: "cancel student loan debt to stimulate the economy"

I found out about this lit­tle move­ment through its Face­book group, “Can­cel Stu­dent Loan Debt to Stim­u­late the Econ­omy.” Basi­cally, a guy named Robert Apple­baum hatched an attractive-to-some but crazy plan to have the gov­ern­ment bail out those car­ry­ing col­lege debt by pay­ing off their loans. This would, allegedly, cause all those for­merly oppressed by

how to think about cutting in line: a follow-up

Here is the sec­ond half to my pre­vi­ous post on this topic, as promised. CAUTION: Ideas in progress! Con­struc­tive crit­i­cism wel­come. It seems to me that there is a (rough) dis­tinc­tion between two kinds of lines: those that are insti­tuted for prac­ti­cal pur­poses, and those that con­fer moral sta­tus upon the per­sons at the front. First,

on the moral status of donating blood

Yes­ter­day, I went and gave some blood. This got me think­ing about the moral sta­tus of donat­ing blood. It’s got to be either oblig­a­tory or supereroga­tory. You might recall these def­i­n­i­tions from my pre­vi­ous post on boy­cotting mar­riage: Oblig­a­tory: If an action is morally oblig­a­tory, that means that you must do it, from the moral