Tag Archives: ethics

unintended consequences: Stupak Amendment & miscarriages edition

One of the most inter­est­ing things I have read about the Stu­pak Amend­ment is this: Will the Stu­pak Amend­ment Affect Insur­ance Cov­er­age for Mis­car­riages? I Think So Sadly, the author expe­ri­enced a mis­car­riage recently. In her case, as some­times hap­pens, the fetus had yet to be expelled. She was put in the dif­fi­cult posi­tion of either wait­ing

retroactive legitimization of regulation

This NYT arti­cle caught my eye: New York’s Cab­bies Like Credit Cards? Go Fig­ure New York’s cab­bies howled when the city began forc­ing them to take credit cards. Some even went on strike, call­ing the require­ments a kow­tow to tourists and a bur­den on dri­vers. But two years later, the back-of-the-cab swipe has emerged as

business-izing higher ed: I’m not scared

A few days back, this post about higher ed in the UK appeared over on one of my favorite blogs, Fem­i­nist Philoso­phers. Here’s the big quote: “Busi­ness sec­re­tary wants stu­dents and par­ents to be treated more like cus­tomers in pro­pos­als to over­haul higher edu­ca­tion.” The orig­i­nal poster wor­ries that “uni­ver­si­ties get put under a great

more thoughts on veganism and well-being

I was thrilled to receive this thought­ful com­ment on my last post on my vegan exper­i­ment: Com­ment from abeala I have some dis­jointed things to say in response. First of all, yes, it can def­i­nitely be dif­fi­cult to have a sig­nif­i­cant other who does not eat the same way as you. Around the time I

madeleine albright thinks I'm going to hell

The other day, I saw a Madeleine Albright quote in my Twit­ter time­line. I don’t know if this Time mag­a­zine inter­view is the orig­i­nal source, but this is the quote (bold): What advice do you have for women who want respect from their male col­leagues? Dana Philbin, CHICAGO Women have to be active lis­ten­ers and

is cultural libertarianism entailed by political libertarianism?

A cou­ple of months ago, I had a debate with a lib­er­tar­ian friend over whether cul­tural lib­er­tar­i­an­ism is correct/good/necessary/whatever. At the time, I was sure that I was what you would call a “cul­tural lib­er­tar­ian fem­i­nist,” as spec­i­fied in the Lib­eral Fem­i­nism entry on the Stan­ford Ency­clo­pe­dia of Phi­los­o­phy (a rep­utable source). Recently, Kerry How­ley

competition is as american as apple pie, except in education

Recently, I saw the above video on Face­book. Basi­cally, it illus­trates the argu­ment that a pub­lic option in health care would com­pete against pri­vate insur­ers to the ben­e­fit of those cov­ered under both kinds of plans. This argu­ment seems like it is sup­posed to appeal to the market-minded among us, who are into com­pe­ti­tion amongst

what really is the rift that divides atheists?

Just the other day, NPR pub­lished an arti­cle that got quite a bit of atten­tion on Face­book: A Bit­ter Rift Divides Athe­ists. Basi­cally, it talks about the dif­fer­ence between “new athe­ism” of peo­ple like Richard Dawkins and Christo­pher Hitchens — “a more aggres­sive, often belit­tling pos­ture toward reli­gious believ­ers,” and more tol­er­ant forms of athe­ism.

why being vegan can be bad for you

I had writ­ten some notes on this topic a while back, but I lost them, so here goes noth­ing. You might have guessed from the topic of this post that I was going to write about why the vegan diet is not nutri­tion­ally ade­quate. That actu­ally isn’t the main rea­son why I think being vegan

why I became vegan

Here’s the sec­ond in a series of posts on veg­e­tar­i­an­ism & ani­mal wel­fare. If you spend any time at all in the veg*n (veg­e­tar­ian and/or vegan) areas of the inter­net (web­sites, blogs, mes­sage boards), you learn the ide­o­log­i­cal ter­ri­tory pretty quickly. For peo­ple who rec­og­nize and take seri­ously the eth­i­cal prob­lems sur­round­ing food ani­mal pro­duc­tion,