Tag Archives: children

life, liberty, and bodily integrity: thoughts on routine infant circumcision

A while back, I shared this blog post on Twit­ter: the only nec­es­sary argu­ment against rou­tine infant cir­cum­ci­sion Although I’ve lost track of the @replies, I recall that there was sig­nif­i­cant push­back from a cou­ple of my fol­low­ers, and so I wanted to say more about the issue. Basi­cally the argu­ment offered at L’Hôte is this: “In a

education, the state, and protecting children from ignorance

The other day, I started Edu­ca­tion and the State by E.G. West. It is some­times argued that state funded, state reg­u­lated, and state pro­vided edu­ca­tion is jus­ti­fied by the neces­sity of  pro­tect­ing chil­dren from igno­rance. So, West begins with two chap­ters explor­ing this argu­ment philo­soph­i­cally and assess­ing how well this “pro­tec­tion” works in prac­tice. These chap­ters

some evidence for parentism

A while back, I wrote a lit­tle bit on “par­en­tism,” which I defined as “con­sist­ing in dis­crim­i­nat­ing against peo­ple on account of their parental sta­tus, or in indi­vid­ual actions and atti­tudes or insti­tu­tional arrange­ments that favor per­sons of a par­tic­u­lar parental sta­tus unjustly.” Here’s some evi­dence for the phe­nom­e­non: you can buy a box of

parentism: an example

What is par­en­tism? Par­en­tism is a less dis­cussed cousin of racism, sex­ism and clas­sism. On my inter­pre­ta­tion, par­en­tism con­sists in dis­crim­i­nat­ing against peo­ple on account of their parental sta­tus, or in indi­vid­ual actions and atti­tudes or insti­tu­tional arrange­ments that favor per­sons of a par­tic­u­lar parental sta­tus unjustly. While surely there are cases wherein peo­ple are