Tag Archives: applied ethics

complications in commercializing curriculum

This NYT arti­cle piqued my curios­ity: Sell­ing Les­son Plans Online Raises Cash and Ques­tions Basi­cally, some teach­ers have made quite a bit of money by sell­ing their les­son plans online to other teach­ers. Some teach­ers’ employ­ers are won­der­ing whether they should be receiv­ing a cut of the prof­its, and one edu­ca­tional expert warns that the

wasting food

Even though I try really hard to buy only the gro­ceries we need and in amounts we can use, my hus­band & I still end up throw­ing away a pretty good bit of food on a reg­u­lar basis. What I can’t fig­ure out is why throw­ing away food feels so much worse than let­ting clothes

business-izing higher ed: I’m not scared

A few days back, this post about higher ed in the UK appeared over on one of my favorite blogs, Fem­i­nist Philoso­phers. Here’s the big quote: “Busi­ness sec­re­tary wants stu­dents and par­ents to be treated more like cus­tomers in pro­pos­als to over­haul higher edu­ca­tion.” The orig­i­nal poster wor­ries that “uni­ver­si­ties get put under a great

more thoughts on veganism and well-being

I was thrilled to receive this thought­ful com­ment on my last post on my vegan exper­i­ment: Com­ment from abeala I have some dis­jointed things to say in response. First of all, yes, it can def­i­nitely be dif­fi­cult to have a sig­nif­i­cant other who does not eat the same way as you. Around the time I

why I became vegan

Here’s the sec­ond in a series of posts on veg­e­tar­i­an­ism & ani­mal wel­fare. If you spend any time at all in the veg*n (veg­e­tar­ian and/or vegan) areas of the inter­net (web­sites, blogs, mes­sage boards), you learn the ide­o­log­i­cal ter­ri­tory pretty quickly. For peo­ple who rec­og­nize and take seri­ously the eth­i­cal prob­lems sur­round­ing food ani­mal pro­duc­tion,

how I semi-accidentally became vegetarian

Ani­mal wel­fare issues are really impor­tant to me, but some­how they have failed to make an appear­ance here so far. Allow me to rec­tify the sit­u­a­tion. This is part 1 of a few posts on my adven­tures in plant-based eat­ing. Flash back to fall 2007. It was my first semes­ter in grad­u­ate school. I was

state control of abortion: funding, or failing to provide?

I am gen­uinely con­fused by this recent Fem­i­niste post, Michele Bach­mann: rad­i­cal pro-choice fem­i­nist? The author offers two pieces of infor­ma­tion that she seems to believe are con­tra­dic­tory. 1. A quote by Michele Bach­mann: “That’s why peo­ple need to con­tinue to go to the town halls, con­tinue to melt the phone lines of their lib­eral

kant on queueing, or why I am not a kantian

In response to my post on how not to think about cut­ting in line, Jacob Levy makes these impor­tant points: I’m puz­zled. This seems like the eas­i­est of cases for a Kant­ian. I can­not will as a uni­ver­sal maxim that the cut­ter be allowed into line, because that would destroy the coher­ence of lin­ing up.

my least favorite facebook group: "cancel student loan debt to stimulate the economy"

I found out about this lit­tle move­ment through its Face­book group, “Can­cel Stu­dent Loan Debt to Stim­u­late the Econ­omy.” Basi­cally, a guy named Robert Apple­baum hatched an attractive-to-some but crazy plan to have the gov­ern­ment bail out those car­ry­ing col­lege debt by pay­ing off their loans. This would, allegedly, cause all those for­merly oppressed by

how to think about cutting in line: a follow-up

Here is the sec­ond half to my pre­vi­ous post on this topic, as promised. CAUTION: Ideas in progress! Con­struc­tive crit­i­cism wel­come. It seems to me that there is a (rough) dis­tinc­tion between two kinds of lines: those that are insti­tuted for prac­ti­cal pur­poses, and those that con­fer moral sta­tus upon the per­sons at the front. First,