Category Archives: teaching

selling philosophy as quasi-science: a parable

I came across an inter­est­ing post by Adam over at Sophist­pun­dit called Being a Scholar When You Can’t be a Sci­en­tist. The author argues that, although dis­ci­plines like his­tory and phi­los­o­phy are not sci­ences, there exist rel­e­vant virtues to be hon­ored in their prac­tice: humil­ity, trans­parency of method, engag­ing exten­sive sources, and clar­ity of pre­sen­ta­tion.

teaching philosophy: possibility vs. plausibility

Here’s some­thing with which I’ve noticed intro to phi­los­o­phy stu­dents tend to strug­gle: the dif­fer­ence between it being pos­si­ble that a the­ory is true, and the theory’s being plau­si­ble. Exam­ple: In the course I’m TAing this semes­ter, one of the top­ics we dis­cussed is the nature of value. In virtue of what does any­thing have

business-izing higher ed: I’m not scared

A few days back, this post about higher ed in the UK appeared over on one of my favorite blogs, Fem­i­nist Philoso­phers. Here’s the big quote: “Busi­ness sec­re­tary wants stu­dents and par­ents to be treated more like cus­tomers in pro­pos­als to over­haul higher edu­ca­tion.” The orig­i­nal poster wor­ries that “uni­ver­si­ties get put under a great