Category Archives: psychology

Seligman on happiness: authentic or by definition?

I’m almost done with Mar­tin Seligman’s well-known book of pos­i­tive psy­chol­ogy, Authen­tic Hap­pi­ness (2003). It’s been a very good read — although I was famil­iar with many of the rel­e­vant research find­ings, from my var­i­ous inter­net trav­els (and Bark­ing Up The Wrong Tree in par­tic­u­lar), Selig­man puts it all together and lays it out in

social welfare, the handicapped, and special education

Com­mon sense may sug­gest that increases in social wel­fare are more eas­ily obtained by focus­ing resources on the men­tally and/or phys­i­cally hand­i­capped, rather than using those resources instead to mar­gin­ally improve non-handicapped indi­vid­u­als’ lives. The capa­bil­i­ties approach, as devel­oped by Amartya Sen and Martha Nuss­baum, would also imply that resources are well-spent when devoted to

poverty, willpower, and virtue ethics

Recently, philoso­pher Michael Cholbi tweeted this story: “Why Can’ More Poor Peo­ple Escape Poverty?”, along with the sug­ges­tion that the find­ings described therein could have impli­ca­tions for virtue the­ory. To make a long story short: “In the 1990s, social psy­chol­o­gists devel­oped a the­ory of “depletable” self-control. The idea was that an individual’s capac­ity for exert­ing willpower was

book review: Schmidtz and Brennan's "A Brief History of Liberty"

Actu­ally, this is more of a book rec­om­men­da­tion than a book review. David Schmidtz is one of my favorite philoso­phers; it was his book “Social Wel­fare and Indi­vid­ual Respon­si­bil­ity: For and Against” (writ­ten with Robert Goodin) that first began to wake me from my dog­matic polit­i­cal slum­bers circa 2006, when I was an under­grad back

learning styles, individual differences, and responsibility

Recently, I came across this video: “Learn­ing Styles Don’t Exist,” by psy­chol­o­gist Daniel T. Will­ing­ham of the Uni­ver­sity of Vir­ginia. Will­ing­ham argues that learn­ing style the­o­ries fail to pre­dict the dif­fer­ences in learn­ing that we would expect to see if they were cor­rect (you should go watch, he explains it bet­ter than I could). Learn­ing

what's in a name? - labels and tracking

Yes­ter­day, I dis­cussed the issue of whether work-related lan­guage is appro­pri­ate for describ­ing learn­ing. Here’s another lan­guage in edu­ca­tion con­tro­versy that has made it into the news lately: ‘At hope’ kids bet­ter than ‘at risk’?: Wash­ing­ton state law­maker wants to ban­ish neg­a­tive labels The bill is moti­vated by the good-hearted desire for dis­ad­van­taged chil­dren to