Category Archives: politics & political

thoughts on NOW and the Stupak Amendment

Dis­claimer: I haven’t been fol­low­ing the health care stuff too closely, because it is exhaust­ing, but this par­tic­u­lar aspect inter­ests me. The National Orga­ni­za­tion for Women is very upset because the Stu­pak Amend­ment passed and is part of the health care bill that passed the house the other day. Accord­ing to the NYT, the Amend­ment “would

retroactive legitimization of regulation

This NYT arti­cle caught my eye: New York’s Cab­bies Like Credit Cards? Go Fig­ure New York’s cab­bies howled when the city began forc­ing them to take credit cards. Some even went on strike, call­ing the require­ments a kow­tow to tourists and a bur­den on dri­vers. But two years later, the back-of-the-cab swipe has emerged as

business-izing higher ed: I’m not scared

A few days back, this post about higher ed in the UK appeared over on one of my favorite blogs, Fem­i­nist Philoso­phers. Here’s the big quote: “Busi­ness sec­re­tary wants stu­dents and par­ents to be treated more like cus­tomers in pro­pos­als to over­haul higher edu­ca­tion.” The orig­i­nal poster wor­ries that “uni­ver­si­ties get put under a great

is cultural libertarianism entailed by political libertarianism?

A cou­ple of months ago, I had a debate with a lib­er­tar­ian friend over whether cul­tural lib­er­tar­i­an­ism is correct/good/necessary/whatever. At the time, I was sure that I was what you would call a “cul­tural lib­er­tar­ian fem­i­nist,” as spec­i­fied in the Lib­eral Fem­i­nism entry on the Stan­ford Ency­clo­pe­dia of Phi­los­o­phy (a rep­utable source). Recently, Kerry How­ley

competition is as american as apple pie, except in education

Recently, I saw the above video on Face­book. Basi­cally, it illus­trates the argu­ment that a pub­lic option in health care would com­pete against pri­vate insur­ers to the ben­e­fit of those cov­ered under both kinds of plans. This argu­ment seems like it is sup­posed to appeal to the market-minded among us, who are into com­pe­ti­tion amongst

state control of abortion: funding, or failing to provide?

I am gen­uinely con­fused by this recent Fem­i­niste post, Michele Bach­mann: rad­i­cal pro-choice fem­i­nist? The author offers two pieces of infor­ma­tion that she seems to believe are con­tra­dic­tory. 1. A quote by Michele Bach­mann: “That’s why peo­ple need to con­tinue to go to the town halls, con­tinue to melt the phone lines of their lib­eral

my least favorite facebook group: "cancel student loan debt to stimulate the economy"

I found out about this lit­tle move­ment through its Face­book group, “Can­cel Stu­dent Loan Debt to Stim­u­late the Econ­omy.” Basi­cally, a guy named Robert Apple­baum hatched an attractive-to-some but crazy plan to have the gov­ern­ment bail out those car­ry­ing col­lege debt by pay­ing off their loans. This would, allegedly, cause all those for­merly oppressed by

feminism, abortion and universal health care

So, I’ve been warm­ing up on this blog for a while now, so I fig­ure it’s time to start link­ing to other blogs that I read. Today’s sub­ject is a post over at Fem­i­niste, “one of the old­est fem­i­nist blogs designed by and run by women from the ground up.” Just as back­ground, let me

FYI, Nancy Gibbs, society doesn't own me

I sub­scribe to Time mag­a­zine because two years ago they made me an offer I couldn’t refuse. How­ever, at this point, I don’t think I would renew even if they paid me to do so. Their reces­sion cov­er­age has been laugh­able, and the opin­ion pieces seem ever more ridicu­lous. One of the lat­est in a

boycotting marriage, part two

I was think­ing about my pre­vi­ous boy­cotting mar­riage post some more, and I fig­ured out that this is a great chance to give a lit­tle ethics les­son on deon­tic ver­dicts. “Deon­tic” just means some­thing like “related to duties.” In this case, we’re inter­ested in moral duties, as opposed to legal duties, or some other kind.