I read this article on CNN the other day: Love in the time of HIV/AIDS . It’s about how HIV/AIDS patients are living longer lives and are increasingly able to do normal stuff like get married (even to HIV negative partners) and have biological kids (who are very often HIV negative). All this is great …
From Feministing: A new study from the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services reports that “the Stupak/Pitts Amendment will have an industry-wide effect, eliminating coverage of medically indicated abortions over time for all women, not only those whose coverage is derived through a health insurance exchange.” Brian at TPMDC writes: In …
One of the most interesting things I have read about the Stupak Amendment is this: Will the Stupak Amendment Affect Insurance Coverage for Miscarriages? I Think So Sadly, the author experienced a miscarriage recently. In her case, as sometimes happens, the fetus had yet to be expelled. She was put in the difficult position of either waiting …
November 11, 2009 – 10:44 am
|
By pamela
|
Posted in criticisms of feminism, current events, feminism, health care, politics & political
|
Tagged abortion, ethics, feminism, feminist, health care, health care reform, healthcare, miscarriage, NOW, pregnancy, pro-choice, pro-life, public option, reproductive care, reproductive health, Stupak Amendment, women
|
Disclaimer: I haven’t been following the health care stuff too closely, because it is exhausting, but this particular aspect interests me. The National Organization for Women is very upset because the Stupak Amendment passed and is part of the health care bill that passed the house the other day. According to the NYT, the Amendment “would …
November 9, 2009 – 7:15 am
|
By pamela
|
Posted in criticisms of feminism, current events, feminism, health care, politics & political
|
Tagged abortion, feminism, feminist, funding, government, health care, health care reform, healthcare, healthcare reform, Hyde Amendment, NOW, philosophy, political, politics & political, pro-choice, pro-life, Stupak Amendment, women's health
|
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvaJYYeXf70] Recently, I saw the above video on Facebook. Basically, it illustrates the argument that a public option in health care would compete against private insurers to the benefit of those covered under both kinds of plans. This argument seems like it is supposed to appeal to the market-minded among us, who are into competition …
October 23, 2009 – 9:29 am
|
By pamela
|
Posted in applied ethics, current events, education, health care, politics & political, school choice
|
Tagged competition, education, ethics, health care, health care reform, healthcare, healthcare reform, philosophy, politics & political, public option, school choice
|
I am genuinely confused by this recent Feministe post, Michele Bachmann: radical pro-choice feminist? The author offers two pieces of information that she seems to believe are contradictory. 1. A quote by Michele Bachmann: “That’s why people need to continue to go to the town halls, continue to melt the phone lines of their liberal …
August 21, 2009 – 9:41 am
|
By pamela
|
Posted in applied ethics, criticisms of feminism, ethics, feminism, health care, politics & political
|
Tagged abortion, applied ethics, ethics, health care, Michele Bachmann, philosophy, Planned Parenthood, reproductive rights, universal health care
|
So, I’ve been warming up on this blog for a while now, so I figure it’s time to start linking to other blogs that I read. Today’s subject is a post over at Feministe, “one of the oldest feminist blogs designed by and run by women from the ground up.” Just as background, let me …
August 14, 2009 – 12:16 am
|
By pamela
|
Posted in criticisms of feminism, feminism, health care, politics & political
|
Tagged abortion, abortion common ground, Capps Amendment, contraceptives, ethics, feminism, health care, health care reform, philosophy, pro-choice, pro-life, reproductive rights, universal health care
|