Category Archives: feminism

diamonds don't enslave women, women enslave women

Part of why I decided to blog again is because I had a back­log of stuff I wanted to write about. Here’s the first of that stuff. Let’s call this the begin­ning of a “Fem­i­nism Fri­day” series. An Engage­ment Ring Is a Deposit on a Wife This piece was writ­ten in response to a recent New

sexism and the equality of persons

This post at Over­com­ing Bias caught my eye the other day: I Am Sex­ist Basi­cally, Robin Han­son points out that a com­mon def­i­n­i­tion and usage of “sex­ism” — hav­ing a “belief or atti­tude that one gen­der or sex is infe­rior to, less com­pe­tent, or less valu­able than the other” is flawed. It makes sci­en­tific obser­va­tion

I don’t know how free Amish women are

Bryan Caplan writes: Ques­tion: How free are Amish women com­pared to other Amer­i­can women?  I say they’re just as free.  I also say, against Will Wilkin­son, that their “for­mal free­dom” is morally sig­nif­i­cant. If the Amish used threats of vio­lence to keep their women in, it would be a ter­ri­ble crime.  As mat­ters stand, though,

some evidence for parentism

A while back, I wrote a lit­tle bit on “par­en­tism,” which I defined as “con­sist­ing in dis­crim­i­nat­ing against peo­ple on account of their parental sta­tus, or in indi­vid­ual actions and atti­tudes or insti­tu­tional arrange­ments that favor per­sons of a par­tic­u­lar parental sta­tus unjustly.” Here’s some evi­dence for the phe­nom­e­non: you can buy a box of

Stupak might reduce abortion insurance coverage, but not accessibility

From Fem­i­nist­ing: A new study from the George Wash­ing­ton Uni­ver­sity School of Pub­lic Health and Health Ser­vices reports that “the Stupak/Pitts Amend­ment will have an industry-wide effect, elim­i­nat­ing cov­er­age of med­ically indi­cated abor­tions over time for all women, not only those whose cov­er­age is derived through a health insur­ance exchange.” Brian at TPMDC writes: In

unintended consequences: Stupak Amendment & miscarriages edition

One of the most inter­est­ing things I have read about the Stu­pak Amend­ment is this: Will the Stu­pak Amend­ment Affect Insur­ance Cov­er­age for Mis­car­riages? I Think So Sadly, the author expe­ri­enced a mis­car­riage recently. In her case, as some­times hap­pens, the fetus had yet to be expelled. She was put in the dif­fi­cult posi­tion of either wait­ing

thoughts on NOW and the Stupak Amendment

Dis­claimer: I haven’t been fol­low­ing the health care stuff too closely, because it is exhaust­ing, but this par­tic­u­lar aspect inter­ests me. The National Orga­ni­za­tion for Women is very upset because the Stu­pak Amend­ment passed and is part of the health care bill that passed the house the other day. Accord­ing to the NYT, the Amend­ment “would

madeleine albright thinks I'm going to hell

The other day, I saw a Madeleine Albright quote in my Twit­ter time­line. I don’t know if this Time mag­a­zine inter­view is the orig­i­nal source, but this is the quote (bold): What advice do you have for women who want respect from their male col­leagues? Dana Philbin, CHICAGO Women have to be active lis­ten­ers and

is cultural libertarianism entailed by political libertarianism?

A cou­ple of months ago, I had a debate with a lib­er­tar­ian friend over whether cul­tural lib­er­tar­i­an­ism is correct/good/necessary/whatever. At the time, I was sure that I was what you would call a “cul­tural lib­er­tar­ian fem­i­nist,” as spec­i­fied in the Lib­eral Fem­i­nism entry on the Stan­ford Ency­clo­pe­dia of Phi­los­o­phy (a rep­utable source). Recently, Kerry How­ley

Cargo, your lip gloss insults my intelligence

If you are not famil­iar with Sarah Hask­ins and her video series, “Tar­get Women,” you should be! She does a great job of hilar­i­ously expos­ing the absur­di­ties of adver­tis­ing that, well, tar­gets women. In the Sarah Hask­ins spirit, I have to share with you my unhap­pi­ness with this prod­uct, Cargo Clas­sic Lip Gloss. Ordi­nar­ily, I would