Category Archives: ethics

on the non-normativity of value-added analysis

As you are likely to have heard by now, the Los Ange­les Times recently con­ducted and pub­lished a value-added analy­sis of some of the city’s ele­men­tary school teach­ers, using data that had been col­lected by the school dis­trict but never pre­vi­ously ana­lyzed in this way. There was a nice sum­mary of the value-added analy­sis and

plagiarism, etiquette, and morality

Pla­gia­rism by col­lege stu­dents has got­ten some atten­tion in the New York Times lately, and it occurs to me that I have dropped the ball on a series of posts about pla­gia­rism that I started ear­lier this sum­mer. Although I had planned to write other stuff next, I’m instead going to allow myself to be

plagiarism, ignorance and responsibility

Here’s the third post in a series on cheating/academic dis­hon­esty in col­lege (first post, sec­ond post). A year and a half ago, I taught an intro­duc­tion to phi­los­o­phy course inde­pen­dently. The lec­tures were in per­son, but the tests were online because the class only met once per week and I didn’t want to use up

prizes, payments, and donating blood

This old post, on the moral sta­tus of donat­ing blood, still attracts a trickle of Google searches to this blog. I won­der who the searchers are — per­haps peo­ple try­ing to get moti­vated to donate, peo­ple try­ing to ratio­nal­ize not donat­ing, or bio­med­ical ethics paper writ­ers? Any­way, I hadn’t donated blood in over six months

book review: Lierre Keith's "The Vegetarian Myth"

Some­where between my ex-vegan inter­view at Let Them Eat Meat, the blog Hunt.Gather.Love, and Pale­o­hacks, it was at least once rec­om­mended to me that I read Lierre Keith’s “The Veg­e­tar­ian Myth.” So, I did. The author spent 20 years as a vegan. Under­stand­ably, veg­an­ism became ever nearer and dearer to her iden­tity, but it also ruined

the wrongness of cheating

Last time, I dis­cussed some prob­lems with the the­ory that, when you cheat, “you’re only cheat­ing your­self.” Today, I have a few things to say on the wrong­ness of cheat­ing. These are by no means com­pre­hen­sive or ground break­ing, just some food for thought. First, I’ll back­track just a lit­tle and say that there is

"you're only cheating yourself"

As a grad­u­ate teach­ing assis­tant and course instruc­tor, I’ve encoun­tered cheat­ing and pla­gia­rism a num­ber of times. I know that many of my friends encounter sim­i­lar issues as well. So, to mark the end of this semes­ter, I thought I’d start a mini-series of posts on the sub­ject. First up: the “you’re only cheat­ing your­self”

what’s there to find?

Last week, I received this for­tune in a for­tune cookie: “Turn your thoughts within — find your­self” Peo­ple say things like this quite alot. It sounds very roman­tic and excit­ing to describe one’s tri­als and tribu­la­tions as being in the ser­vice of some greater, higher goal — that of find­ing one­self. Now, I’m not par­tic­u­larly

sexism and the equality of persons

This post at Over­com­ing Bias caught my eye the other day: I Am Sex­ist Basi­cally, Robin Han­son points out that a com­mon def­i­n­i­tion and usage of “sex­ism” — hav­ing a “belief or atti­tude that one gen­der or sex is infe­rior to, less com­pe­tent, or less valu­able than the other” is flawed. It makes sci­en­tific obser­va­tion

my immortality poll & paper

I tweeted this recently: Phi­los­o­phy poll: T/F — Death is a nec­es­sary con­di­tion for the mean­ing­ful­ness of life; immor­tal­ity is incom­pat­i­ble with mean­ing­ful­ness. Here are the totally unrep­re­sen­ta­tive results: False — 6 True — 3 (assum­ing that this response counts as a “true”) For what­ever it’s worth, my vote is “false.” Assum­ing that the mean­ing­ful­ness of one’s life