Category Archives: education

Putting NH's new alternative curricula law in context

Recently, my good buddy Jason Becker shared this arti­cle with me over here. An excerpt: New Hampshire’s Republican-dominated Leg­is­la­ture over­rode Demo­c­ra­tic Gov. John Lynch’s veto Wednes­day to enact a law let­ting par­ents request an alter­na­tive cur­ricu­lum for any sub­ject they object to, leg­is­la­tion that crit­ics say could limit children’s access to a com­pre­hen­sive and qual­ity edu­ca­tion. H.B. 542

"teaching to the situation"

I have another post up at Kos­mos: “Teach­ing Advice: Teach­ing to the Situation”

social welfare, the handicapped, and special education

Com­mon sense may sug­gest that increases in social wel­fare are more eas­ily obtained by focus­ing resources on the men­tally and/or phys­i­cally hand­i­capped, rather than using those resources instead to mar­gin­ally improve non-handicapped indi­vid­u­als’ lives. The capa­bil­i­ties approach, as devel­oped by Amartya Sen and Martha Nuss­baum, would also imply that resources are well-spent when devoted to

"great books": de jure or de facto?

I recently began read­ing Louis Menand’s The Mar­ket­place of Ideas: Reform and Resis­tance in the Amer­i­can Uni­ver­sity, picked up on a whim from the library. Menand makes an excel­lent point in pass­ing about so-called “great books” cur­ric­ula (aka “gen­eral” or “lib­eral” edu­ca­tion, and pos­si­bly “com­mon core”), a point which I had not pre­vi­ously seen made

"education is like a series of micro-traumas"

Said by a pro­fes­sor in pop cul­ture class today, with a cer­tain air of… res­ig­na­tion?: “Edu­ca­tion is like a series of micro-traumas. You do an assign­ment, hand it in, get eval­u­ated, feel badly about your­self.” So, so true. Must it be this way? Sigh.

educational technology: the great teacher heterogenizer?

I fin­ished this book, “Lib­er­at­ing Learn­ing,” in the fall, and some­how for­got to post a review. Chubb & Moe are impor­tant play­ers in edu­ca­tion pol­icy, hav­ing pre­vi­ously pub­lished influ­en­tial work regard­ing school choice & com­pet­i­tive forces in edu­ca­tion mar­kets. This newer book is about tech­nol­ogy and ways in which it can dis­rupt the struc­tures and

on the non-unequivocal goodness of questioning authority

Look, friends. I’m far from a fan of author­ity, per se. On any given day there’s like a 30% chance that I will assent to full-on anar­chism. But I need to dis­cuss how annoy­ing (and pos­si­bly per­ni­cious) this “ques­tion author­ity” catch­phrase truly is. The con­cept of author­ity is pretty closely tied up with that of exper­tise.

I don't care about the original intent of value-added models

I’m tak­ing a break from end-of-semester mad­ness to offer this mini-rant, inspired by a pas­sage in this WP arti­cle, “Lead­ing math­e­mati­cian debunks value-added”: When value-added mod­els were first con­ceived, even their most ardent sup­port­ers cau­tioned about their use [Sanders 1995, abstract]. They were a new tool that allowed us to make sense of moun­tains of

have your college and eat it too: consuming education

Today, I want to make what, to my economics-ish friends, are prob­a­bly some painfully obvi­ous points. How­ever, I had never explic­itly con­sid­ered this angle on college/education before tak­ing eco­nom­ics of edu­ca­tion last semes­ter, and I sus­pect that it’s some­thing many oth­ers of even my rather intel­li­gent friends and col­leagues have also failed to con­sider in depth.

garbage can model of ed policy: random, unpredictable, or both?

Ok, so yes­ter­day I tweeted this: Annoy­ing: when peo­ple con­flate the dif­fer­ence between ran­dom and merely unpre­dictable processes. It received a fair bit of atten­tion. This is my attempt to explain the con­text. Please bear in mind that I am nei­ther a sta­tis­ti­cian nor a sci­en­tist of any kind. These are just my reflec­tions on