“appreciating” secretaries, “appreciating” teachers

Last week was Admin­is­tra­tive Pro­fes­sion­als’ Day. On this day, you are sup­posed to take some time to thank your sec­re­tary and/or other sup­port staff, usu­ally with a gift or lunch or what­ever. A Face­book friend who shall remain name­less expressed baf­fle­ment at the exis­tence of said hol­i­day, claim­ing that admin­is­tra­tive pro­fes­sion­als should not get extra recog­ni­tion just for “doing their jobs.”

Of course, my mind imme­di­ately snapped to Teach­ers’ Appre­ci­a­tion Day/Week, which is com­ing up soon, actu­ally. Would the Face­book friend be as quick to reject that hol­i­day, on the grounds that teach­ers are also merely doing their jobs? Fully expect­ing to get flamed, I made a com­ment to this effect on the Face­book thread. Oh no, she replied, teach­ers deserve the extra recog­ni­tion because they are so badly under­ap­pre­ci­ated, under­paid, and they “make us who we are today.”

Well this is where I almost spat my drink at my mon­i­tor. I have no doubt that these sen­ti­ments are very, very widely held. But they are unjus­ti­fied, or at least are very hasty gen­er­al­iza­tions. Con­trary to pop­u­lar belief, teach­ers on the whole are not in fact paid badly at all. The Cato Insti­tute has done research in this area; see espe­cially this report and this post. And teach­ers do “make us who we are today” — but “who we are today” is unfor­tu­nately a pop­u­la­tion whose mem­bers often don’t read, write, or do math suf­fi­ciently well even to carry out basic life activ­i­ties, and “who we are today” is a coun­try that spends more on edu­ca­tion than ever before — with no appar­ent pay­off, except to teach­ers and other bureaucrats.

And, just on a per­sonal note,  I think I’d rather be the per­son who I would have been in the absence of about 1/3 of the teach­ers I had in K-12. Sur­pris­ingly many of them were not only incom­pe­tent, but petty, power-hungry, and even vin­dic­tive. I remain angry and bit­ter about those dam­ag­ing years, and it’s part of why I’m so inter­ested in edu­ca­tion now (Maybe I’ll write a whole post on my anger and bit­ter­ness another time). But, because it was a wealthy area, most of the stu­dents did just fine aca­d­e­m­i­cally — despite these bad teach­ers, not because of them. And, every year, the par­ents were cough­ing up expen­sive gifts and gift cer­tifi­cates for the poor, under­ap­pre­ci­ated teach­ers. I reckon that many of the teach­ers who truly deserve some extra appre­ci­a­tion — those who work with severely under­priv­i­leged stu­dents, those whose schools are unsafe, those who don’t make a decent liv­ing — are those who are, sadly, the least likely to receive it, hol­i­day or not.

So I don’t know what to make of this sit­u­a­tion. Obvi­ously, I’m not a big fan of Teach­ers’ Appre­ci­a­tion Day (in fact, it makes me stabby). But, then, are both Admin­is­tra­tive Pro­fes­sion­als’ Day and Teach­ers’ Appre­ci­a­tion Day unjus­ti­fied? Or is there some impor­tant dif­fer­ence between the two pro­fes­sions that I’m over­look­ing? The inten­tions are prob­a­bly good — to draw atten­tion and recog­ni­tion to female-gendered, often mar­gin­al­ized lines of work. But per­haps these hol­i­days are now past their prime. If you know an admin­is­tra­tive pro­fes­sional or a teacher who is gen­uinely excep­tional, you should thank him or her on your own time and on your own way. To sug­gest that all of these pro­fes­sion­als are wor­thy of recog­ni­tion and rewards just for exist­ing is not fair to the ones who truly are.

11 Comments

  • I think all “appre­ci­a­tion” and “aware­ness” days are point­less, but mostly harmless.

    But since you fully expected to be flamed, let me just say that ques­tion­ing the merit of (any) teach­ers makes you Hitler.

  • And what about all the appre­ci­a­tion show­ered on vet­er­ans, who freely decided to join the mil­i­tary at the pre­vail­ing pay rates?

    On the other hand, maybe we’d have to pay teach­ers or sol­diers more if it weren’t for the recog­ni­tion, since they receive so much of their “pay” on non­mon­e­tary mar­gins, such as respect and reverence.

  • Greg,
    I sus­pect that these appre­ci­a­tion days are less about ben­e­fit­ting the peo­ple that are sup­pos­edly being sin­gled out for appre­ci­a­tion, and more about some politi­cian or any­one else who cham­pi­ons the day sig­nal­ing how much they care about that par­tic­u­lar group.

  • Good point. I guess it’s one of those things you can vote for that can’t pos­si­bly make you look bad.

  • Yep — and if you even so much as hint that teach­ers don’t deserve it, peo­ple think you are Hitler (chuckle, which is why a link to this post is not going on face­book). And you are prob­a­bly not get­ting re-elected, in no small part due to teach­ers unions. Teach­ers, like most humans of course, will get defen­sive. But surely each of them has at least one col­league who they think is not doing a good job?

  • Once I was at an astrol­ogy museum up in New York with my fam­ily. We watched a film that described black holes as “infi­nitely dense”.

    I don’t even know what that means” my dad commented.

    I have some col­leagues like that,” my Uncle, a teacher, replied :)

  • Vet­er­ans’ Day is maybe a lit­tle dif­fer­ent, because you’re not sup­posed to actu­ally go buy a vet­eran a gift, and the events to com­mem­o­rate it (ben­e­fits, fundrais­ers, con­certs) are truly voluntary.

    Gifts and cards for teach­ers, which would oth­er­wise be sym­bols of approval and affec­tion, are often ren­dered mean­ing­less by the con­texts in which they are given. Par­ents have kids who get stuck in a school with a teacher who they didn’t choose. With some fre­quency, they dis­ap­prove of these teach­ers. But, just to add insult to injury, the room mom keeps call­ing you for dona­tions of cash and food for a whole week-long fes­ti­val of teacher appre­ci­a­tion. And if you don’t do it, you and your kid will be pushed even fur­ther to the mar­gins of the com­mu­nity than you already are, as dis­senters. Nice.

    The respect for teach­ers part is inter­est­ing. I don’t know what to make of the cur­rent state of affairs — some peo­ple seem to have a blind rev­er­ence for them, and some have con­tempt for them. I read some social theory-ish work per­ti­nent to that recently, I will try to remem­ber to post about it in the future.

  • I def­i­nitely agree that I grew up to have some degree of intel­lec­tual accom­plish­ment despite teach­ers and a flawed school sys­tem (in Sweden)—not thanks to them. Good teach­ers exist and should be rec­og­nized; the major­ity is barely ade­quate to down-right harmful.

    In my impres­sion­teach­ers are no longer con­sid­ered a high-status group, but are cor­rectly rec­og­nized for (on aver­age, I stress) being less than bril­liant. That they long held con­sid­er­able sta­tus is likely a rem­nant of times when higher edu­ca­tion was rare, some­times to the point that the local vil­lage had a teacher, a med­ical doc­tor, and a priest—and then no-one else with a non-practical edu­ca­tion above the junior-high level.

    As for the appre­ci­a­tion days, I do see a greater jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the “admin­is­tra­tive pro­fes­sional”, con­sid­er­ing that they often are unright­fully looked down upon in the office. They may be eas­ier to replace than many other office work­ers (e.g. an engi­neer with a mas­ters degree), and they may have a dif­fer­ent intel­lec­tual hori­zon, but even so they deserve a basic respect—which is often lack­ing. (Not to be for­got­ten is that the spread in intel­lect can be quite large within the group, say between a trainee recep­tion­ist and the per­sonal sec­re­tary of a For­tune 500 CEO.)

  • For­got to say thanks for stop­ping by and express­ing your agree­ment! I am sad to know, how­ever, that Swe­den is sim­i­larly screwed up :-/

  • Caitlin wrote:

    I also saw this com­ment on Fb from said friend and chose to sim­ply ignore rather then get in a heated discussion.

    What’s wrong with giv­ing a bit of appre­ci­a­tion to an occu­pa­tion that prob­a­bly doesn’t receive much any­ways? I know that’s a bit of a gen­er­al­iza­tion, but I don’t under­stand the dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion between teach­ers and sec­re­taries. Teach­ers are looked at as life chang­ers and yet I as well have mem­o­ries of teach­ers not allow­ing me to use the restroom until I peed my pants and was then tor­tured by fel­low students…that’s life chang­ing alright!

    I’d love to hear your bit­ter­ness towards teach­ers and education.

  • You mean this about the admins, right — “What’s wrong with giv­ing a bit of appre­ci­a­tion to an occu­pa­tion that prob­a­bly doesn’t receive much anyways?”

    I don’t think there’s any­thing wrong with it, really. It’s just if you want to approve of admins day and dis­ap­prove of teach­ers day, you have to find some *rel­e­vant dif­fer­ence* between the two groups that jus­ti­fies the dif­fer­ing treat­ment of them.

    Maybe one of the dif­fer­ences is that teach­ers make us pee our pants and admins don’t! I almost had the same thing hap­pen a num­ber of times — made my mother furi­ous. She said to just go to the bath­room any­way, and she’d deal with the con­se­quences later. So ridiculous.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *