<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: thoughts on NOW and the Stupak Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisfieldisrequired.com/2009/11/09/thoughts-on-now-and-the-stupak-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisfieldisrequired.com/2009/11/09/thoughts-on-now-and-the-stupak-amendment/</link>
	<description>ethics, education, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: unintended consequences: Stupak Amendment &#38; miscarriages edition &#171; this field is required</title>
		<link>http://thisfieldisrequired.com/2009/11/09/thoughts-on-now-and-the-stupak-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>unintended consequences: Stupak Amendment &#38; miscarriages edition &#171; this field is required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisfieldisrequired.com/?p=224#comment-77</guid>
		<description>[...] It may be described as an abortion. If so, then the Stupak Amendment (which I wrote about earlier this week) would forbid public funding of these procedures even in the case of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] It may be described as an abortion. If so, then the Stupak Amendment (which I wrote about earlier this week) would forbid public funding of these procedures even in the case of […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

